Martin Luther King Jr. or Malcolm X: Which Civil Rights Icon is the Lesser Evil?

Chad O. Jackson has sparked some serious conversation with his controversial views on Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. He claims that both leaders have been misrepresented throughout history, with Malcolm X somehow emerging as the lesser of two evils. It’s a bold take, especially since many of us have grown up viewing King as the ultimate hero of the civil rights movement. Wait until you hear what Jackson has to say about King’s famous “I have a dream” speech—spoiler alert: he argues it wasn’t even original!

Jackson goes on to suggest that King was less about uplifting communities and more interested in pushing for socialist policies. And if that wasn’t enough to raise eyebrows, he flat out says Stanley Levison—someone deeply connected with the communist party—was basically King’s puppet master. This revelation hits hard, poking holes in the narrative we’ve all been taught about who inspired change in America and why. Are we really ready for this kind of historical reevaluation?

This whole discussion could make you rethink everything you believe about civil rights icons. Are they as infallible as we’ve grown to believe, or are there darker moments in their legacies that we gloss over? It’s definitely food for thought, especially when it comes to reshaping how we view our heroes. What do you think—does knowing the truth about historical figures change their impact on society today? Let’s get talking!

About the Author

U Witness News Staff

Administrator

Visit Website View All Posts