<a href="https://reason.com/2025/07/16/how-environmental-groups-use-hysteria-to-get-rich-and-stop-progress/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
It’s a shocking revelation: environmental groups are sitting on a financial treasure chest, bringing in a whopping $8 billion in donations in 2020 alone. You’d think with that kind of cash flow, they’d be out there planting trees and saving the polar bears. Instead, critics are raising eyebrows, saying these organizations are more focused on racking up legal fees than actually making a positive impact on our planet. Who knew political theater could be so lucrative?
Physicist Mark Mills quips that these organizations have mo’ money than the industries they protest against. It appears that while they’re busy staging crisis spectacles about extinction and environmental doom, they might actually be helping their bottom line more than the bees and polar bears. Science writer Jon Entine says it’s all about the drama, and let’s face it, fear sells. But do they actually believe in what they’re selling, or is it just cash in the bank?
As the Sierra Club proudly announces its victories against fossil fuel pipelines, critics point out that those very pipelines are often better for the environment than trucking oil. It’s a classic case of “save the planet—just not in MY backyard!” Meanwhile, the endless lawsuits mean that essential infrastructure projects are getting stalled, leaving us yearning for cleaner energy solutions. Maybe it’s time these groups put their funds where their mouths are and start building instead of blocking!
So, what do you think? Is it time to reform how donations are used in the environmental movement, or are we justified in being skeptical of these groups? Let’s hear your thoughts below!
About the Author
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!
