<a href="https://www.theblaze.com/news/macfarlane-trump-ptsd-assassination-threat" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
In a shocking turn of events, CBS News correspondent Scott MacFarlane recently revealed he took trauma leave, citing PTSD after an assassination attempt on President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. Instead of focusing on the gravity of the incident, he pointed to the “terrifying” anger of Trump supporters as the source of his distress. With quotes like, “You saw it in the eyes, the reaction of the people. They were coming for us!” it’s no wonder this story has stirred up emotions online. Who knew the political climate could get this heated?
Of course, the internet wasted no time barking back. Critics took to social media to express disbelief that MacFarlane would spotlight his own trauma over the tragic loss of life that day. Comedian Greg Gutfeld even poked fun at the situation, dubbing MacFarlane “the real hero” while others questioned whether it was justified to express such feelings in light of more pressing issues. Talk about adding fuel to the fire!
This saga raises an interesting question: When does a journalist’s mental health take precedence in reporting on a tragic story? Is it okay for journalists to prioritize their own feelings in these situations, or should the focus solely be on the event’s victims? Let’s stir the pot, shall we? Your thoughts?
As we continue to untangle the complex relationship between mental health and high-pressure reporting environments, one thing’s for sure: the conversation around these issues isn’t going away anytime soon. Strap in, folks, because this is one ride that looks like it might get even bumpier!
About the Author
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!
