
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/07/22/alligator-alcatraz-contracts-disappeared-from-a-florida-state-database/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
In a move that could give new meaning to the phrase “alligator wrestling,” Florida’s Division of Emergency Management has yanked contracts for its “Alligator Alcatraz” immigrant detention camp from public databases. After reporters started digging into the $250 million facility in the Everglades, the state decided to replace detailed contracts with vague summaries, raising more than a few eyebrows. It turns out, those contracts contained “proprietary information,” according to the FDEM, but critics claim Florida’s supposed transparency is flimsier than a gator’s toothpick.
The uproar isn’t just about disappearing contracts; it’s about how over $200 million of taxpayer dollars are being managed—or mismanaged—at a facility dubbed “Alcatraz.” Even Florida state Rep. Anna V. Eskamani noticed this rough patch of government grifting when she confirmed that multiple contracts had vanished from the Florida Accountability Contract Tracking System. Relying on obscured details doesn’t just seem shady; it makes you wonder what else could be lurking in those murky waters.
Transparency advocates are pushing back, arguing that if the Florida government truly cares, it could simply redact sensitive information instead of hitting delete on the entire contract. Did the FDEM really expect no one to care about where their hard-earned tax money goes? It’s like owning a pet gator: fun and all until you realize it needs a lot of attention and might just snap at you when you’re not looking! So, what do you think—should all contracts be fully transparent, or is there such a thing as too much information in government contracts?
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!