Kohberger’s Chilling Plea: Can Autism Save a Murderer?

Bryan Kohberger, a former criminology student, is now facing life in prison after pleading guilty to the brutal murders of four Idaho students. What’s chilling about this case isn’t just the severity of the crime—it’s his bizarre attempts to escape the death penalty. At one point, he had his lawyers argue that he should be spared due to claims of autism. Spoiler alert: that didn’t go over well in court!

The details of the crime are just as disturbing as Kohberger’s tactics. The victims—Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin—were stabbed multiple times, with one suffering over 50 wounds. That’s not exactly a light read for your Saturday morning coffee. Adding to the creep factor, Kohberger mentioned his weapon in a Tinder conversation, asking a woman what she thought was the worst way to die. Talk about a red flag! Who needs horror movies when you have real stories like this to give you chills?

It’s hard to fathom how someone who studied criminology could dive headfirst into such a heinous act. While some might see it as simply a crime of passion, the way he handled himself before and during the investigation raises eyebrows. Is there even a redeeming quality in this story, or is it just a profound reminder of the darker sides of human nature? It certainly sparks a conversation about mental health and accountability in serious crimes. What do you think—can mental health claims genuinely impact the legal system?

About the Author

View All Posts