
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/07/25/if-trump-wants-american-businesses-to-thrive-he-should-get-rid-of-government-subsidies/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
President Donald Trump recently stirred the pot by declaring that American businesses don’t need those cushy government subsidies to thrive. In a post on Truth Social, he claimed he wants entrepreneurs, including the likes of Elon Musk, to succeed on their own merit—while calling into question the billions of taxpayer dollars funneled into private businesses. It’s like saying, “Hey, can we stop giving extra credit to the kid who never studies?”
With a hefty $181 billion a year going toward direct cash subsidies and indirect support for various industries, some experts argue that this financial comfort might be making companies lazy. How to compete when the government’s handing out cash like candy? Critics say that letting businesses lean on federal support can lead to complacency and hinder innovation. And wouldn’t it be interesting to see how much competition firms could drum up if they had to rely solely on their merits?
Among the many programs being scrutinized is the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment initiative, which, after a whopping $42.5 billion investment, still hasn’t managed to connect a single person. This raises the question: are subsidies worth it? As Trump’s tariffs raise eyebrows by acting as hidden corporate subsidies, it seems businesses might benefit more from a little tough love—market-style.
If there’s one takeaway, it’s this: Should the government really be playing sugar daddy to businesses? If so, what happens when the sugar runs out? Let’s debate—would cutting subsidies make the economy stronger or leave businesses floundering?
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!