
<a href="https://reason.com/volokh/2025/08/06/vulgar-signs-condemning-city-official-1200-feet-from-officials-home-constitutionally-protected/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
In a wild turn of events in Old Town, Maine, Joseph F. Roussel decided to turn his frustration with city manager William Mayo into a spectacle. Picture it: a leisurely boat ride transformed into a not-so-civil shouting match, complete with colorful language that would make even a sailor blush! Roussel didn’t stop there; he also put up some choice signs near Mayo’s home that would definitely not pass the “family-friendly” test. You have to admire his commitment to expressing his views, even if it’s a bit crass.
The saga didn’t end with the shouting or the signs. A cease harassment order from Sheriff Robert Young aimed to put a damper on Roussel’s free speech—oh, the irony! But in a surprising turn, the court ruled that Roussel was entitled to his colorful expressions under the First Amendment. Who knew shouting from a boat and sticking up rude signs was a slippery slope to a court case? This ruling raises questions about where we draw the line on free speech, especially when it comes to public officials.
Have you ever been so frustrated with a public figure that you wanted to take matters into your own hands? What do you think about Roussel’s methods? Sometimes, the best form of protest is digging deep into your bag of expletives and showing them how you really feel, right? It’s a hilarious reminder that even in the serious business of politics, humor might be just a boat ride away.
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!