
<a href="https://reason.com/volokh/2025/08/13/why-the-supreme-court-is-highly-unlikely-to-overturn-obergefell-in-the-kim-davis-case/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk whose refusal to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples launched a national conversation on religious freedom, is trying to shake things up again. She’s filed a petition with the Supreme Court, asking them to overturn the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling that legalized same-sex marriage across the country. While her crusade attracts headlines, legal experts are raising eyebrows, suggesting her chances of success are as slim as a piece of printer paper.
Davis claims her First Amendment rights should protect her from the consequences of her refusal, arguing that her actions were rooted in deeply held religious beliefs. However, the appeals court already shot down her claims, reminding her that public officials can’t simply refuse to do their jobs because of personal beliefs. It’s kind of like saying you won’t serve fries at a restaurant because they’re not your favorite. Too bad; it’s about serving everyone, not just your preferred customers!
As the Supreme Court gears up to decide whether to take on this case, observers are scratching their heads. The momentum against Obergefell seems to be just a whisper compared to the roar seen with Roe v. Wade. If anything, Davis’s legal battle might serve as a reminder that when it comes to changing established law, it takes more than just a personal prayer and a petition. What do you think? Is this a serious legal challenge, or just another chapter in the ongoing saga of Davis’s court drama?
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!