
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/08/14/the-new-york-times-goes-full-karen-on-mark-zuckerberg/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
Mark Zuckerberg is back in the news, but this time it’s not about social media scandals or algorithm controversies—it’s about his kids’ education. The New York Times has served up a spicy story about how Zuckerberg’s lofty private school ambitions for his children have some neighbors in a tizzy. Apparently, setting up a school on his own massive property has raised eyebrows and, yes, city code concerns. Who knew educational choices could stir up such drama?
Let’s be real: if you had Zuckerberg’s money, would you be sending your kids to a regular public school? He opted for a private, pod-based homeschool scenario, which might sound like the dream for most parents. After all, who wouldn’t want a bunch of tiny students running around in a mansion-like compound with teachers on staff? But the neighbors aren’t thrilled about the drop-off chaos. Is this really what causes unrest in quiet neighborhoods—kids learning in the lap of luxury?
What’s fascinating is how the media and public opinion are treating his initiative. Could it be that providing a free school for a handful of neighborhood kids is somehow more controversial than, say, funding massive tech development projects? It seems like we might be sorting out the whole “It’s okay when we do it, but not when you do it” kind of hypocrisy here. Isn’t it time we rethink how we view education options?
So what do you all think: should Zuck have the right to educate his kids however he pleases? Or does it just draw too much scrutiny given his wealth? Let’s hear your thoughts!
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!