
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/08/20/smithsonian-heat/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
In a recent social media uproar, President Donald Trump took aim at the Smithsonian, labeling it “OUT OF CONTROL” for its focus on the darker aspects of American history. He’s not a fan of all the talk about slavery and the struggles of the downtrodden, arguing that museums should spotlight success and positivity instead. With his lawyers gearing up to implement changes similar to those in colleges and universities, one can’t help but wonder: will our museums become a place where success takes center stage, or will they lose a vital part of our history in the process?
Leading the charge is Lindsey Halligan, who wants to find a happy medium—she’s concerned that overemphasizing negatives only divides us further. But isn’t there value in acknowledging our past mistakes? It seems like the debates around museums are just a microcosm of a larger cultural clash. On a related note, the article delves into universal basic income discussions, revealing recent studies that question whether giving cash truly solves poverty. Spoiler alert: it doesn’t always have the desired effect, leaving us with the age-old question of just what does work for our society?
So, as we contemplate the future of our museums and how history is presented, here’s a thought to chew on: If you could choose the narrative that your children learn about America, what would it look like? Would you lean towards a brighter future or a more honest past—perhaps a mix of both? Let’s hear your take!
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!