
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/08/20/west-texas-am-drag-ban-defeated-in-court/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
In a legal twist that feels ripped from an LGBTQ+ rights drama, West Texas A&M University students are rejoicing after a federal court ruled they can host their charity drag show. After being blocked by university president Walter Wendler, who claimed drag shows undermine human dignity, the students turned to the U.S. Court of Appeals for help. It turns out, a drag show can’t be canceled just because someone finds it “cartoon-like.” Who knew?
The controversy kicked off when Spectrum WT, the university’s LGBT-focused student club, sought to use a campus venue for their charity event benefiting the Trevor Project. While the university seemed fine with various other events—everything from local livestock shows to candidate forums—Wendler put the brakes on the drag show, leading to FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) filing a lawsuit. The appeals court agreed that censoring the show would violate First Amendment rights.
Judge Leslie H. Southwick pointed out that dragging down artistic expression just because it’s not everyone’s cup of tea isn’t a valid reason. So, the moral of the story? The court firmly declared that drag shows are protected expression, and it turns out, President Wendler wasn’t prepared to defend his position. Now that the gloves—and wigs—are off, what do you think? Can drag shows help bridge divides and spark necessary conversations on campuses?
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!