
<a href="https://www.theblaze.com/news/dc-police-commander-under-investigation-for-allegedly-manipulating-crime-stats" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
The Metropolitan Police Department in Washington, D.C., is caught in a whirlwind of controversy after Police Commander Michael Pulliam was placed on administrative leave for allegedly manipulating crime statistics. The accusations originated from the D.C. Police Union, which claims that Pulliam’s department is downgrading serious crimes to lesser offenses in an effort to present a rosier picture of public safety. Who knew that managing crime could be as tricky as managing your social media presence, right?
According to union chairman Gregg Pemberton, officers have been instructed to alter reports on serious offenses, like shootings or stabbings, into far less alarming categories. Apparently, a felony assault sounds much better for the stats than admitting that D.C. has crime issues. As Pemberton aptly put it, there’s “absolutely no way” that recent reports of violent crime dropping by 26% can be true, especially when these figures don’t align with what residents have been experiencing.
Chief Pamela Smith has responded to the allegations by assuring the public that any irregularities would be dealt with swiftly, saying that the department is keen on maintaining the trust of the community. Let’s just hope this doesn’t turn into a classic case of “the numbers don’t lie”—unless they absolutely do. It’s like trying to convince your parents that you didn’t eat the rest of the pie, even though you’ve got crumbs all over your face!
So, what do you think? Can the public trust the crime stats that local police departments provide, or are we witnessing just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to data manipulation? Let’s hear your thoughts!
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!