Doctor’s Silent Treatment: What’s Behind O’Connor’s Fifth Amendment Plea?

The drama in Washington is heating up as former White House physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor took the Fifth when grilled about President Joe Biden’s health. That’s right—he chose silence over transparency in a congressional hearing that had everyone expecting juicy revelations. When asked if he was ever told to lie about Biden’s health or if he believed the president was unfit for duty, O’Connor’s lips were sealed tighter than a jar of pickles on a bad day. What could possibly be so sensitive that a doctor would resort to invoking his rights?

O’Connor’s attorney claims this isn’t about dodging the truth; apparently, it’s all about protecting patient confidentiality. But let’s be real—many question whether answering those specific questions actually breaches that sacred physician-patient privilege. Host Sara Gonzales threw some shade on that argument, suggesting that it seems a little too convenient. You know things are getting interesting when a doctor’s silence raises so many eyebrows!

There’s definitely a sense of circus-like tension here, and it feels like only the tip of the iceberg has been uncovered. As this unfolds, it’s hard not to wonder what else might be lurking beneath the surface. Is this a simple case of medical ethics at play, or are we staring down the barrel of something far more scandalous? What do you think this means for political transparency, and is there ever a good reason for silence in such matters?

About the Author

View All Posts