Drew v. Dahmer: NYC Shooter Sparks Shocking Comparison

A recent tragedy in New York City has sparked quite the heated debate. After Shane Tamura, a shooter who killed four people, left a suicide note claiming he wanted his brain studied for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE), Dr. Drew stepped in to draw parallels with none other than Jeffrey Dahmer. Yes, you read that right. The infamous Milwaukee serial killer is now part of this conversation, thanks to Tamura’s chilling acts.

Dr. Drew pointedly commented that studying Tamura’s brain wouldn’t reveal anything helpful or insightful about his motives. It’s a fascinating idea that raises eyebrows because, let’s face it, how much can we really learn from an examination long after someone has committed such heinous acts? The only takeaway might just be a confirmation of some sort of neurological issue. Kind of makes you feel like we’re missing the point, doesn’t it?

What’s even more interesting (or perhaps bizarre) is that just like Dahmer’s mother, who fought to have her son’s brain studied, Tamura’s appeal for examination is rejected by experts who think there’s no wisdom to be gained. Maybe we should focus on living humans instead of dissecting the past’s horrors. After all, understanding how to prevent such events seems a tad more pressing than knowing the inner workings of a killer’s mind.

So what do you think? Should we dig into these brains or keep our focus on healing the living and preventing future tragedies? It’s a thought-provoking dilemma that might just rattle your own beliefs about crime and psychology. Let’s hear your thoughts!

About the Author

View All Posts