
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/08/01/el-salvador-just-made-it-legal-for-bukele-to-stay-in-power-indefinitely/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
El Salvador just made a bold move in the political arena, and it’s raising eyebrows worldwide. President Nayib Bukele’s party, New Ideas, pushed through constitutional changes that now allow him to run for reelection indefinitely. This change, passed with a swift 57–3 vote, also eliminates the second round of elections and extends presidential terms from five to six years. If you thought political dramas peaked in the U.S., think again—El Salvador is giving us quite the show.
While Bukele gained fame for his tough stance on gangs and unique approach to cryptocurrency, the cost of his leadership has been steep. More than 2 percent of the adult population has been imprisoned under a “state of exception,” and many are wondering how much of a trade-off safety really is. Critics are warning that his consolidation of power could lead El Salvador down a slippery slope toward dictatorship. It almost feels like an edgy Netflix series; you can’t look away, but deep down, you’re cringing for the characters stuck in a crumbling democracy.
Despite the international uproar, many Salvadorans prioritize security over the threats to their democratic rights. After all, they’re tired of dodging bullets on the streets. But can safety truly come at the cost of freedom? As the political winds shift, it might be time to ask ourselves: how far are we willing to go to feel safe?
So buckle up, because El Salvador seems to be writing its own version of “Game of Thrones,” and the power play is just getting started. What’s your take—should the ends justify the means in governance, or do we risk losing too much in the name of security?
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!