
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/07/24/curtailing-federal-control-over-emissions-should-be-done-by-congress-not-the-epa/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
The Environmental Protection Agency is preparing to say goodbye to its endangerment finding, a critical rule that’s been in place since 2006, allowing the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. This move comes after EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin declared it’s time for a rethink, arguing that the agency may have exceeded its authority under the Clean Air Act. It’s almost as if they’re playing an epic game of regulatory tug-of-war—will it be the EPA or Congress pulling the strings on emissions regulations next?
Experts are weighing in, with some saying it might be prudent for Congress, not the EPA, to take the lead in changing these regulations, as this could put an end to the infamous back-and-forth that has plagued environmental policies for years. Meanwhile, climate scientists argue that it’s high time the endangerment finding gets an update since over fifteen years have passed, and ignoring such scientific advancements is like wearing last year’s fashion to a gala—just a tad outdated.
In a time when everyone’s debating the future of energy and the planet, it’s essential to consider what an overhaul of these regulations could mean. Could we see a world where energy security doesn’t come at the cost of our environment, or will the pendulum swing back again? Now that’s a thought worth pondering!
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!