
<a href="https://reason.com/video/2025/07/29/why-does-the-government-run-air-traffic-control/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
You might not give air traffic control a second thought while sipping your in-flight soda, but it’s not all smooth skies up there. Recent scrutiny highlights the aging, overworked system that’s struggling with outdated technology and staffing shortages. After a devastating midair collision in Washington, D.C., which left 67 people dead, the criticism has intensified. There are urgent calls for change—not just a sprinkle of cash, but a complete overhaul. Dorothy Robyn, former White House staffer, suggests breaking air traffic control away from government shackles and running it more like a utility. Sounds wild, right?
Imagine a future where air traffic control isn’t dictated by Congress and its whims. It’s a feasible idea when you look at countries like Canada, which has managed to streamline its operations and keep the skies safer. Americans are still relying on a system that’s been under federal management since the 1930s, and some are wondering if it’s high time to let the professionals handle it instead of politicians. Because let’s be real, we don’t ask Congress to design our airplanes—why should they run the air traffic that gets us in and out of the sky?
With so many aviation upgrades on the table, the conversation about reforming air traffic control is just heating up. It makes you wonder: could our skies really be safer with a little less red tape? Or should we just invest in a good “Fly With Confidence” sticker? What do you think?
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!