
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/07/28/why-is-the-army-corps-still-harassing-idaho-landowners/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
The battle over wetlands in Idaho has taken a surprising turn, thrusting landowners Rebecca and Caleb Linck into a fierce confrontation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. After a significant Supreme Court ruling clarified when wetlands fall under federal authority, you’d think the Corps would take a hint — but not quite. Instead, they’re insisting that an isolated patch of land owned by the Lincks, located 350 feet away from legitimate water sources, is still under their jurisdiction. Now, that’s what you call a long-distance relationship!
The Lincks, who just want to farm their 4.7-acre land which has been in the family for over four decades, hired a wetlands consultant thinking they were safe. With neighbors like Michael and Chantell Sackett winning their cases in similar situations, it seemed like a no-brainer. But here comes the Corps, armed with convoluted reasoning and the threat of $68,000 per day in penalties. Talk about a buzzkill for those peaceful farming dreams!
It raises an intriguing question: how many bureaucratic hurdles should landowners like the Lincks have to leap before they can enjoy their property? While government agencies have their job to do, it feels a bit excessive to target homeowners in this manner. Thankfully, the Lincks aren’t backing down and are ready to fight for their rights. After all, this isn’t a plot twist we’d expect in the middle of Idaho’s pastoral landscape. What do you think — should federal regulations be re-evaluated in light of this case?
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!