<a href="https://reason.com/2025/08/01/the-irs-is-now-25-percent-smaller-and-hopefully-less-dangerous/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
The IRS has shed 25 percent of its workforce, signaling a significant shift in how the federal government approaches tax collection. With over 25,000 employees taking voluntary buyouts or facing layoffs, the agency’s new leaner structure has some wondering if this is a reason to cheer or a new recipe for chaos. Tax examiners and revenue agents are taking the hardest hits, but who will fill the gaps left behind? Or does it just mean fewer agents to poke around in our financial closets?
Some folks view the cut as a blessing, dreaming of a future where tax audits become as rare as a unicorn sighting. Yet, there’s also a nagging concern: fewer agents might lead to increased non-compliance, especially for small businesses. And let’s not forget, the tax code remains as tangled as ever, with its endless rules and red tape. So while the IRS might be smaller, the complexity of taxes is still looming like an unwelcome guest at the dinner table.
This reduction raises an interesting question for all of us: Is a smaller IRS good for taxpayers or just another layer of bureaucracy waiting to trip us up? It’s clear that fewer agents could lead to less scrutiny, but let’s see whether it invites more taxpayers into the arms of that winding tax code. What do you think—are we better off without all those agents, or is this cut just asking for trouble?
About the Author
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!
