Is Colbert’s Farewell a Case of Political Shenanigans or Just Bad Ratings?

Stephen Colbert’s farewell is making waves, with many liberal fans convinced that the cancellation of his show is wrapped up in political pressure from the Trump administration. Progressive writer Molly Jong-Fast thinks it smacks of self-censorship, which is a pretty bold claim considering there are other explanations floating around. Reports indicate that CBS is pointing to financial reasons for the show’s demise, saying it simply cost too much to keep going while bringing in fewer viewers.

Adding fuel to the fire, former NPR CEO Vivian Schiller has thrown her hat in the ring, calling CBS’s financial rationale “circumstantial.” She argues that if they can spend on other projects, why not keep a late-night staple that critics say has served a vital purpose? Brian Stelter, CNN’s chief media analyst, even got insider gossip that echoed CBS’s line about finances—yet he can’t shake the feeling that Colbert’s biting political take may have landed him in hot water.

The real kicker? Colbert’s viewers are aging like fine wine—currently averaging at 68! With a dwindling younger audience, it’s hard to believe CBS won’t shift resources. So, was it the bottom line that did Colbert in, or is there a more scandalous story lurking beneath the surface? What do you think about the supposed demise of late-night humor?

About the Author

View All Posts