
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/08/11/the-self-sustaining-outrage-cycle-of-sydney-sweeneys-jeans-ad/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
Sydney Sweeney’s latest ad campaign for American Eagle has turned into a battlefield of outrage, memes, and questionable interpretations. In the ad, Sweeney casually mentions, “My jeans are blue,” while playfully referencing “genes,” triggering a firestorm of accusations and comparisons to historical figures that most of us would prefer to leave in the past. Who knew a simple jeans ad could get so complicated? It’s denim warfare out there!
The moment the ad dropped, critics sliced it up with some pretty serious claims, suggesting it embraced eugenics and fascism. A notable post on X (formerly Twitter) racked up over 3.4 million views, prompting debates about societal beauty standards and what it means to have “good genes.” This led to a wave of conservative commentators jumping on the bandwagon, claiming that progressives were in a tizzy over Sweeney’s beauty, even while actual criticism from the left was nowhere to be found. Did they just invent a leftist monster to battle for clicks? It’s the age-old question of whether we’re creating outrage or merely manufacturing it for ratings.
Speaking of ratings, the fine folks at Fox News dedicated hours of coverage to this incident while a certain former president jumped at the chance to applaud Sweeney’s political leanings upon discovering she registered as a Republican. Talk about a plot twist! Between the faux outrage and political opportunism, one can’t help but wonder if the real winners here are the jeans themselves, because let’s be honest—everyone’s talking about them now. So, what did you think of the whole affair? Can jeans really cause this much drama, or are we all just a bit too sensitive for our own good?
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!