
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/08/08/brickbat-take-it-outside/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
In a bizarre turn of events at a recent City Council meeting in Kyle, Texas, resident Mary Ann Flores-Cale was escorted out while she was raising some serious red flags about the city officials. The mayor, Travis Mitchell, decided to intervene, claiming her remarks were personal attacks—allegations of misconduct and an affair that certainly added some drama to the discussion. Who knew local government could be so scandalous?
As if the plot couldn’t thicken more, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or FIRE for short, has jumped in, challenging the council’s rules on free speech. They’re arguing that Flores-Cale’s right to express concerns shouldn’t be muzzled simply because the content made some leaders squirm. It’s always eye-opening to see how rules are bent or broken when things get a little too hot to handle.
Mayor Mitchell insists that it wasn’t about what Flores-Cale said, but how she refused to yield the floor that prompted her removal. So, is this a case of silencing dissent or simply maintaining order? It’s a difficult balance that many local governments try to achieve, but one that could lead to some important debates about accountability. Given the uproar, the city of Kyle might need to pull an all-nighter to re-examine its Code of Ethics and hold onto those citizens who just want to speak their mind—after all, it’s not every day you get kicked out for telling the truth!
What do you think? Should residents be able to criticize local officials even if it ruffles some feathers?
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!