
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/07/23/marjorie-taylor-greene-is-dead-wrong-about-outlawing-climate-geoengineering/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is making waves—or should I say, trying to stop them—by introducing the “Clear Skies Act,” which proposes making weather modification a felony in the U.S. Greene, ever the provocateur, has a knack for stirring up controversy, and this bill is no exception. With her claims about protecting our air and skies, she’s taking a hard stance against geoengineering practices like cloud seeding and solar radiation management. But let’s face it, there’s a lot more at stake than just keeping her skies clear.
While Greene is focused on stopping atmospheric tinkering, researchers are busy exploring various geoengineering methods as potential solutions for climate change. Can you believe it? The very practices Greene wants to outlaw could actually help combat the rising temperatures and extreme weather patterns we’re seeing today. Imagine if her ban stifles innovation just when we might need it most! It’s a classic case of being too concerned about the “what ifs” when we should be thinking about the “how to.”
So here’s the million-dollar question: Should we really be closing the door on researching ways to cool our planet? Future generations may be faced with serious climate challenges, and banning geoengineering research might not be the best way to ensure them a clean, safe world. What do you think—should we risk it for the sake of rectifying our earlier mistakes, or should we let nature take its course? The debate around climate solutions is heating up—much like the planet itself!
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!