
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/08/20/9-years-ago-marco-rubio-explained-why-trumps-birthright-citizenship-order-is-unconstitutional/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
In a political twist that could make a soap opera look tame, Marco Rubio is facing the music for his past defense of birthright citizenship while serving in the Trump administration. Back in 2016, Rubio stood as a champion for this right, declaring that anyone born in the U.S. deserves citizenship. Fast forward to now—he’s caught up in the clash between President Trump’s controversial executive order that aims to narrow the scope of who qualifies for citizenship. It’s a pretty bold move, considering this goes against a long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
Legal experts are weighing in, saying that Trump’s position could unravel more than a century of precedent—how thrilling! They argue that only children of diplomats and certain foreign military invaders fall outside the umbrella of birthright citizenship. Besides that? If you’re born on U.S. soil, welcome to the club! So, one has to wonder: will Rubio stick to his guns or pivot to align completely with Trump as the Supreme Court gears up to tackle this hot topic?
This situation raises some great questions about citizenship and identity. Shouldn’t we be proud of our nation’s inclusive values? It makes you think—if birthright citizenship can be challenged, what’s next? I guess we’ll just have to wait and see how this dramatic political saga unfolds, just like reality TV.
What are your thoughts? Is birthright citizenship a right we should defend at all costs, or is it time for a reevaluation? Let’s chat!
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!