<a href="https://reason.com/2025/07/14/theres-probably-no-smoking-gun-in-the-jfk-or-epstein-cases-we-should-be-allowed-to-look-anyway/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
The recent unveiling of CIA documents has dusted off some old skeletons regarding the JFK assassination, particularly around Lee Harvey Oswald and his eerie connections with the agency. Historians like Jefferson Morley are pulling away at the layers of the cover-up, suggesting that Oswald may not have been the lone wolf he was made out to be. Instead, it turns out he might’ve had Uncle Sam lurking in the shadows, which is enough to make you wonder if there’s more to this tragic story than we’ve been told.
Meanwhile, we’ve got the Epstein saga continuing to spark debate, specifically about the mystery of his so-called “client list.” With the recent buzz around potential high-profile connections, it feels like we’re in a game of conspiracy whack-a-mole. Is there really an organized list somewhere, or is it more about the notorious Rolodex of dubious associates? Either way, the investigation is providing juicy glimpses of a tangled web that links power, greed, and scandal – because what would a mystery be without a sprinkle of intrigue?
Both the JFK and Epstein stories emphasize the importance of transparency from those in power. If there’s anything we’ve learned, it’s that secrets rarely stay buried forever, especially when curious minds do some digging. So, what do you think? Are we ready to uncover more skeletons from our collective past, or is it safer just to let sleeping dogs lie?
The hunt for answers continues, and whether we like it or not, it might just lead to some surprising revelations, or at the very least, a rousing game of “guess who.”
About the Author
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!
