Should We Trust the Government With Olympic Gold?

When you think of Olympic athletes, you probably picture glory, gold medals, and a whole lot of sweat. But what happens when politics jumps in the ring? The recent discussion around the potential for government funding for Olympic athletes raises eyebrows—not just for how it could tamper with training, but also because it could lead to politicians meddling in who gets to wear those coveted gold medals. Imagine a Congress hearing where coaches have to explain why a particular athlete didn’t make the cut—now that’s a reality show I’d watch!

But that’s just part of the story. While Congress considers funding to support Olympic hopefuls, the concern is that collegiate sports, especially football, are hogging all the cash and slicing funding for critical Olympic sports. So, while football teams rake in revenue, are we sacrificing our future medalists in gymnastics, swimming, or track and field? It raises the question—shouldn’t we just let our athletic talent shine without a political spotlight shining on them?

Meanwhile, the House Judiciary Committee is also stirring up drama over antitrust exemptions for leagues like the NFL and their hefty streaming prices. This scrutiny could flip the business model on its head. As fans grapple with rising costs and search for the best deals, the leagues might just discover that their audience is more than just loyal fans—it’s also budget-conscious streamers hunting for bargains.

And let’s not forget about Las Vegas, the City of Sin, which is experiencing a downturn. High prices, lackluster service, and declining visitor numbers suggest that the glitz and glam might need a reality check. Maybe Vegas should focus less on who can throw the biggest party and more on why people actually love to visit. After all, you can only enjoy all-you-can-eat buffets if you can afford the trip there!

About the Author

View All Posts