Erik Menendez’s parole denial has stirred up quite a drama, and his wife, Tammi, is not holding back. She labeled the hearing a “complete setup” after Erik was turned down for parole, claiming Commissioner Robert Barton seemed to have made his decision long before Erik even stepped foot in the room. Talk about a lack of due process! Even though Erik hasn’t had any significant infractions since 2011—aside from a minor cell phone mishap—his history was dug up to justify the denial.
Tammi’s frustration is palpable as she argues that Erik has been working hard toward rehabilitation. After all, are we not supposed to give people a chance to change? While these past prison violations included some eyebrow-raising incidents like drug smuggling and inappropriate behavior, it’s hard not to wonder if a few mistakes should overshadow years of progress. The Menendez family isn’t taking this lightly either; they’ve expressed their disappointment but remain unwavering in their support for Erik.
As the family gears up for Lyle Menendez’s parole hearing, they’re holding out hope that perhaps the second time will be the charm. But it begs the question, what does justice really mean in this scenario? Can someone’s past always define their future, or is it time to turn the page?
So, what do you think? Is it fair to deny parole based on old infractions when someone seems to be on the right path now? Let’s hear your thoughts!
About the Author
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!
