When ICE Goes Incognito: The Curious Case of Secret Attorneys in Immigration Courts

In a twist that seems straight out of a courtroom drama, immigration courts are now dealing with some serious identity issues. It turns out that attorneys representing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are keeping their names under wraps, thanks to some judges in New York opting for privacy over transparency. This eyebrow-raising practice has left immigrant attorneys and the public scratching their heads—shouldn’t we know who’s behind the gavel and upholding the law? How can anyone trust a process when the players are hidden?

During recent hearings, immigration judges like ShaSha Xu and James McCarthy simply referred to ICE lawyers as “Department” and chose not to disclose their identities, creating a shadowy atmosphere that’s raising more than a few concerns. Legal experts are crying foul, noting that anonymity in the courtroom could hinder accountability and make it tough to address any unethical actions. It’s almost like a game of hide and seek, but in this case, the stakes are incredibly high. If these are the people who are shaping the future for immigrants, don’t we deserve to know who they are?

The conversation around transparency is more important than ever, especially as deportation rates climb and the system moves with increasing speed under pressure from the higher-ups. When it comes to our justice system, hiding just might be the worst strategy ever. But here’s a thought: Would you want your own government representatives to remain anonymous? That’s a conversation we need to have.

So, what do you think? Is the veil of secrecy better for our judicial system, or do we owe it to ourselves to see who’s pushing the buttons? Let’s hear your thoughts!

About the Author

View All Posts