
<a href="https://reason.com/2025/08/14/brickbat-body-shaming/" target="_blank">View original image source</a>.
The United Kingdom’s Advertising Standards Authority has dropped the hammer on Zara, banning two of their ads featuring models deemed “unhealthily thin.” The decision stems from concerns that these ads promote harmful beauty standards. Featuring one model with a gaunt appearance and another with protruding collarbones, the ASA didn’t hold back, declaring the ads “irresponsible.” Zara removed the ads but insisted their models had medical certificates stating they were in good health, adding a twist of irony to the whole situation.
This ban also follows a similar crackdown on ads from Next earlier this year, raising eyebrows and questions about why the industry seems to be targeting extremely thin models while heavier representations go unhindered. It’s a bit of a double standard, isn’t it? With all the focus on body positivity and representation lately, many are wondering if there will come a day when all body types can feel included—or if we’re merely playing whack-a-mole with the definitions of beauty.
In the end, it’s clear the conversations around body image are more electrifying than ever, and Zara’s situation may just spark a revolution in the advertising world. Can we imagine a future where real bodies are celebrated in fashion ads? The possibilities are endless, much like trying to fit into those jeans from college.
So, if you had to pick a side, would you rather see more diversity in ads or stick to the tried-and-true skinny models? Let’s dish it out in the comments!
To get daily local headlines delivered to your inbox each morning, sign up for newsletter!